CONCOCT.
Back to blog
Pricing6 min read

CMMS Alternatives for Multi-Location Operators

Concoct team

Illustration of a pile of spreadsheets flowing through a process into one multi-location dashboard.

It is 9pm and the walk-in cooler at store seven is warm. You have a text thread with the store manager, an email from a contractor you cannot find, and a spreadsheet tab that may or may not list who serviced that unit last. You are not shopping for software at that moment. But moments like this are what start the search for CMMS alternatives multi-location operators eventually run.

This post is a plain walk through the five approaches multi-site operators most commonly use. It is a category overview. We name no products, and we do not quote competitor prices. Each approach works for some operators. The useful question is where each one starts to strain as you add sites.

Option 1: Spreadsheets

A shared spreadsheet is a real system. One tab for equipment, one for open issues, one for vendors. For two or three sites run by one person, it can be the right answer.

Where it holds up: Low cost, fully flexible, everyone already knows how to open it.

Where it strains: Nothing prompts anyone. A spreadsheet will not tell you a job has sat open for four days. It cannot send a contractor a link, and it keeps no clean history of who did what. When two people edit at once, the "current" version becomes a matter of opinion.

Option 2: A shared inbox and text threads

A maintenance@ address, a group chat per region, a phone full of contractor numbers.

Where it holds up: Zero setup, and contractors already know how to reply to an email.

Where it strains: The history lives in whoever's inbox it landed in. If your operations lead leaves, the record leaves. You cannot answer simple questions such as "how many times has this fryer been repaired" without searching by memory. Status is invisible: you only learn a job is stuck when someone complains.

Option 3: Enterprise facilities platforms

These are the large systems built for hospital campuses, plants and big property portfolios. They are deep, configurable and often tied to procurement, finance and asset-lifecycle modules.

Where it holds up: If you run hundreds of sites with a facilities department, approval chains and an IT team, the depth matters.

Where it strains for a 4-to-20-site franchisee: Setup is often a project in itself, sometimes with outside help, so ask for a realistic timeline and who does the work. Many store managers and contractors will never log in to something that heavy.

Option 4: Per-seat maintenance tools

Many tools charge per user per month. This is a perfectly reasonable model when a few people use the system.

Where it holds up: If one coordinator runs everything and the rest of the team does not log in, the seat count stays low and the bill stays predictable.

Where it strains in a multi-location business: The people who see problems first are store managers, and there are as many of them as you have sites. Every extra person you want to log a request is another seat. The usual workaround is sharing logins or routing everything through one person, which brings back the inbox problem. We worked through this arithmetic in per-seat vs per-location CMMS pricing. The short version: count the people who will touch the system, not the people who will manage it.

Option 5: Per-location tools

Here you pay for each site you run, and the number of people using the system does not change the bill. For a business whose growth means opening locations, that tracks how you already think about costs.

Where it holds up: Predictable cost per site, and you can let every manager and supervisor in without a budget conversation.

Where it strains: If you have one or two large sites with many staff and little else, per-location pricing offers little advantage. Also check how locations are counted and when billing starts. Those definitions vary between tools.

Concoct is in this last group, so weigh what follows accordingly. Pricing is per location per month in USD, with unlimited users on every tier. Our own rollout advice is to add locations as they go live, because each top-level location is billed when you add it. Things we do not do: there is no offline mode, no SMS, no configurable approval rules, and no automatic backup-vendor routing. If a job gets no response from an assigned vendor for 24 hours, the assignment is dropped and your owners and operations managers are alerted to reassign it by hand. If you need any of those other things, put them on your checklist and ask every vendor you evaluate, us included.

How to choose between CMMS alternatives for multi-location operators

Start with where your pain actually is. Then match it to a category.

  • Jobs get lost between a manager and a contractor: you need dispatch with status, whatever the pricing model. A passwordless vendor workflow matters here, because contractors will not create accounts.
  • You cannot tell what a site's equipment history is: you need equipment records and a job log more than you need advanced reporting.
  • Costs are surprising you: model the bill at your real headcount and your real site count, at today's size and at double.

Then run a short test. Pick two sites, put real jobs through the tool for two weeks, and see whether managers and contractors use it without being chased. If you do move, a staged plan beats a big-bang switch. Our 30-day rollout plan for 10 sites lays one out.

Verify this yourself

Everything here describes categories, not specific products. Features and pricing change, and vendors describe themselves generously. Get current pricing in writing, ask what is excluded from each tier, and test with your own jobs before you sign anything.

If you want to see how a per-location model prices out for your site count, the pricing page lists every rate in USD, and you can book a demo to walk through your own setup with us. We will say plainly if we are not the right fit.

FAQ

Is a spreadsheet really not enough for multiple locations?

For a few sites and one person doing the coordinating, a spreadsheet can be enough. It tends to break when several people need to update it, when contractors need to be contacted from it, or when you need a history you can search.

What is the main difference between per-seat and per-location pricing?

Per-seat pricing scales with the number of people who log in. Per-location pricing scales with the number of sites. Which is cheaper depends on how many people will use the system at each site, so count real users before comparing quotes.

Do I need an enterprise facilities platform for 10 or 15 sites?

Usually not. Enterprise platforms are built for large facilities teams with formal approval chains and procurement integration. A multi-unit franchisee with a small head office typically needs dispatch, equipment records and a job history that store managers will actually use. Check your own requirements before assuming you need more.

How long should a trial of a new maintenance tool run?

Long enough to see real jobs go through, often a couple of weeks or more. Use two sites rather than all of them, and measure whether managers log requests and contractors respond without reminders. Confirm any trial terms with the vendor directly.

Will my contractors have to create accounts?

That depends on the tool, so ask. In Concoct, vendors get a passwordless link by email for each job, scoped to that one job. They can accept, decline, update status and add a note. They cannot upload photos or attach invoices through it; invoices still come by email.